may.labs / a personal inquiry
The Way
to Wake Up.
What do we do with this strange, finite experience of being alive?
I started studying all of this because I wanted to understand how to live. What to do with this weird, crazy experience of being alive. Why are we here? Is there a why? What should we do with our limited time? Is there a right way?
I’ve looked for answers in physics, biology, psychology, philosophy, meditation. I keep finding ideas that help, sometimes in places that seem to have nothing to do with each other. The history of the universe. The way a thought appears. What another animal might experience. How to spend an afternoon.
For me, they belong in the same conversation. Each changes how I understand being here, and what I want to do with it.
I kept getting stuck in loops in my own mind. And something that helped, slowly, was perspective: we are so small in the grand scheme of things and yet have immense power in our vicinity. So small, so complex and so connected.
I want somewhere to put that understanding together. Somewhere I can return when a problem becomes my whole world, or when I’m going through the days without really being in them.
These are the questions I keep coming back to.
01 / Our place in the larger picture
Where are we?
It’s strange how easily I forget where any of this is happening.
I’m on a planet, in a universe that existed long before anyone could worry about what to do with their life. There are distances I can read about without really being able to imagine them. Entire histories happening beyond anything I will ever see.
Then there’s me, trying to make the right decision.
I find something freeing in that proportion. My problem can be real and still be small. It can deserve care without becoming the measure of my entire existence. Sometimes I need to remember that the world contains more than whatever my attention has narrowed around.
But looking outward also does something else. The further I follow the story of what I’m made of, the less separate I seem.
The matter in my body has a history. Many of its elements were made in stars. The air, the water, the food, everything that keeps this body going comes from outside the boundary I call me. I’m part of the thing I’m looking at.
I like the image of a whirlpool in a river. Water keeps moving through it, and for a while a shape holds. Alan Watts gives me a way to think about myself like that: a pattern, temporarily here, inseparable from what moves through it.
Thich Nhat Hanh’s interbeing takes that same intuition somewhere more intimate. Look at anything closely enough and you find the conditions that made it possible. Follow my own life backward and there are people, places, things I never chose and things I will never know.
The problem stays. The frame widens.
The problem is still here.
the problemother parts of life
Explore the ideas
Scale, time, and the matter we borrow
Science / perspective
The universe is about 13.8 billion years old. Putting a human life beside that history is an exercise in perspective, not a measurement of its worth. Many elements in our bodies were produced in stars; hydrogen has an earlier origin. Smallness and belonging are the meanings I take from those facts.
NASA · The universe ↗The whirlpool and interbeing
Contemplative interpretation
The whirlpool is a metaphor for continuity through change, not a complete biological account of a person. Interbeing asks us to notice the conditions that make anything possible. Together, these ideas help me connect the history of matter to the relationships that sustain a life.
Alan Watts, The Book (1966); Thich Nhat Hanh, The Heart of Understanding (1988)
And once I begin questioning the boundary between me and everything else, I want to look more closely at what I mean by “me.”
02 / The experience of being someone
What are we?
I experience my life from inside a mind that feels very convincing.
A thought appears, and suddenly I’m arguing with it. A feeling arrives, and the world seems to confirm it. I can spend hours inside a story before noticing that I’m telling one.
Learning about the mind has made me less certain that my immediate experience is the whole explanation.
I’m a biological being. I carry drives I didn’t invent, in a body with needs that don’t disappear because I would prefer to be rational. Hunger, fear, attachment, the need to belong. It helps me to think about evolution here. I stop expecting every impulse to have my happiness as its objective.
And somewhere in all of this, there is the experience of being me. A felt center, looking out at everything else. I find that strange. The universe contains beings that can experience it, and I’m one of them, trying to understand what that even means.
When I pay attention, thoughts appear before I’ve decided what to think. Which makes me wonder about the person I imagine behind them, directing everything. What am I actually authoring?
This is what draws me to the question of free will. How much could I have been otherwise? And if I’m inseparable from the conditions that produced me, what does that change about how I see myself and everyone else?
I’m drawn to Harris and Sapolsky here. Following the causes backward makes the idea of a completely independent author harder for me to hold. I know that argument isn’t settled. What has mattered personally is how it changes blame. There is less room for treating myself, or another person, as if we appeared from nowhere and simply decided to be this way.
There are still consequences. There are things to repair and boundaries to keep. But a thought doesn’t have to become a definition of who I am, and a person doesn’t have to be reduced to one thing they did.
Explore the ideas
The felt self and thoughts that arise
Experience / interpretation
Anil Seth explores how perception and the felt self are constructed. Sam Harris invites attention to thoughts as appearances in experience. These are related inquiries, but noticing a spontaneous thought does not by itself establish that every form of agency is an illusion.
Anil Seth, Being You (2021); Sam Harris, Waking Up (2014)
The question of free will
Philosophical disagreement
Sapolsky argues that our actions arise from causes we did not choose. Compatibilists such as Daniel Dennett understand freedom in terms that can coexist with causation. My interest here is what this inquiry does to blame and compassion; the essay does not resolve the debate.
Robert Sapolsky, Determined (2023); Daniel Dennett, Elbow Room (1984)
And if I can extend that understanding to myself, it becomes harder to deny it to everyone else.
03 / Other lives, seen from the inside
Who are we here with?
Other people have an entire experience happening inside them too.
I know this, obviously. And still, I can move through the world as if other people are mainly characters in whatever is happening to me. What they think of me. What they gave me. What they failed to give me.
Remembering that part of it was never about me has brought relief. Another person has their own history, their own fear, things they can articulate and things they can’t. I can be affected by them without being the explanation for them.
I find connection in trying to understand how someone arrived at a view different from mine. We’re both here, human and limited, trying to make sense of something from the inside.
And the company extends beyond humans.
Reading about other minds makes our way of being feel less like the obvious standard for everything. An octopus is living something I can barely imagine. My own experience gives me a very small window into what experience could be.
I’m drawn to the ethical idea that the capacity to feel matters more than being clever. A being doesn’t need to impress me to deserve consideration. Suffering doesn’t become less consequential because it happens in a form unfamiliar to me.
This changes what I do with the thought that we aren’t special. I feel less need to rank us above everything, and more curiosity about what we’re part of.
It changes how I think about differences among people too. Different minds, needs, limits. I want room for those differences, including the ones that need support.
Explore the ideas
Other minds
Biology / philosophy
Different nervous systems invite questions about different forms of experience. An octopus is not simply a human mind in another body. The illustration is symbolic, not anatomical, and does not equate biological networks with consciousness.
Peter Godfrey-Smith, Other Minds (2016)
Feeling and moral consideration
Ethical position
Peter Singer places the capacity to suffer at the heart of moral consideration. Evidence about another being’s experience can inform our choices, but the step from that evidence to an obligation is ethical reasoning. This is a position I’m drawn to, not a fact that ends the discussion.
Peter Singer, Animal Liberation (1975)
Which brings me back to the question underneath all of this: why is any of it here at all?
04 / Living with an open question
Why are we here?
This is where I run out of certainty.
I can learn about how things developed, how life evolved, how a mind works. The question of an ultimate purpose remains.
I don’t have an answer I can establish. I have interpretations I’m drawn to, experiences that have changed me, things that seem true when I’m living them and become harder to hold onto afterward.
I’m learning to let that be an honest position.
The Zen perspective I keep returning to makes room for existence without requiring a final explanation. It just is. There is something here to experience before I know what to conclude about it.
That can be frustrating for a mind that wants coherence. Mine would very much like to understand the whole thing and then proceed accordingly.
But I’m suspicious of the point where I take an interpretation and stop questioning it because having an answer feels better. I want a way to live that leaves room to discover I was wrong.
For now, I can choose what I live by and pay attention to what happens. Does it help me see more clearly? Does it make me more available to life and to other people? What does it ask of me in practice?
Not knowing an ultimate why doesn’t make life meaningless to me. Meaning is something I encounter through being involved. Making something. Understanding something. Loving someone. Using what I can do to contribute to a world I share.
Thinking matters to me. It’s part of how I participate. But I can also think about meaning for so long that I’m no longer doing anything through which I might find it.
Explore the ideas
An explanation and a purpose
A distinction
An account of how something happened does not necessarily tell us what it is for. Neither does the absence of a known ultimate purpose establish that nothing matters. I want to leave that space open without postponing my life inside it.
Letting the question stay open
Personal reading of Zen
Through meditation and koan practice, I’m interested in what happens when I stop requiring a complete conceptual answer before meeting experience. “It just is” describes a perspective I return to; it is not a summary of every Zen tradition or proof of a metaphysical conclusion.
Henry Shukman · The Way; Rilke, Letters to a Young Poet
Which leaves the question I have to live with, whether or not I ever find an ultimate answer.
05 / What we do with the time we have
How do we live?
This is the question the others keep changing.
I have limited time, limited energy, an incomplete understanding of myself and the world. I will never get to everything. Oliver Burkeman helped me take that limit more seriously. There isn’t a version of my life in which I make enough correct decisions to avoid having to choose.
Some possibilities will remain possibilities. What I actually spend my time doing becomes my life.
I once wrote that if life is the sum of our Wednesdays, I was afraid I would look back and see myself standing still, full of ideas, making excuses for not going to live them.
That still gets me.
I want to create things. Learn. Be outside. Have conversations where I really see someone and let them see me. Use my abilities to make something better. Feel my life with my body too, rather than experiencing everything from inside my head.
I also want to be able to recognize when something is already enough.
Meditation keeps saying some version of: it’s okay, just live. My response was that before, my life actually wasn’t okay. There were things that needed changing. I don’t want to lose that distinction.
Sometimes I need to act. Sometimes I need help. Sometimes I need to notice that I’m still searching for a problem to solve when there is already a life here I wanted.
I’m trying to become more able to tell.
And kindness keeps surviving the whole inquiry.
Whatever I believe about the universe, other beings can be hurt. I can make someone’s day harder or easier. I can listen, create, help, repair. My reach has limits, but within those limits there are real lives.
Explore the ideas
Finitude and choosing
Philosophy / practice
Four Thousand Weeks considers what follows when we accept that we cannot fit everything into a life. Choosing involves real loss; that does not mean we chose badly. I’m interested in what deserves my time when doing everything is no longer the goal.
Oliver Burkeman, Four Thousand Weeks (2021)
Attention, participation, and care
Personal commitment
Attention can bring me back to what I am doing, but it is not a promise of complete control. Creating, relating, resting, and asking for help are all ways of participating. Kindness is what I want to practice, not an ethical conclusion proven by cosmic scale.
I want this understanding to affect how I spend my time. To come back to it when I’m turning a decision into a verdict on my existence, or postponing living until I feel certain, or simply forgetting to notice where I am.